|
Step-by-Step Instructions Free Probate Forms |
Seattle & King County | Tacoma & Pierce County Everett & Snohomish County | All Washington For Attorneys, Lawyers, & the Public |
Washington Wills > What Is a Will in Washington?
WILL
A legal
declaration that names one or more persons to manage one's estate and provides for the
transfer of one's property at death, historically, of only one's real property. Contrast: TESTAMENT.
TESTAMENT
A legal
declaration that names one or more persons to manage one's estate and provides for the
transfer of one's property at death, historically, of only one's personal
property. Now obsolete, as a Will now covers both real and
personal property.
ESTATE
The
aggregate of all property and interests in property owned by an individual.
PROPERTY
Anything
which may be the subject of ownership, such that its owner has the exclusive
right to possess, to use, to exclude others from it, and to transfer it to another.
REAL PROPERTY (aka
REALTY)
Property consisting of:
Land;
Property permanently affixed to land (eg, buildings);
Property contained within (eg, minerals) or growing (eg, crops and trees) on land; and
Any interest in such property (eg, a life estate or remainder).
PERSONAL PROPERTY (aka
PERSONALTY)
All property that is not real property, generally either tangible personal
property (having physical presence, such as cars, clothing, furniture, books,
jewelry, etc.) or intangible personal property (representing an ownership right,
such as notes of indebtedness or securities, and including a contract interest
in real property, such as a lease).
TESTATOR
Literally, "one
who makes a Will."
TESTATRIX
A female testator.
A. The Document
|
instrument 1. A written document that defines rights, duties, entitlements, or liabilities, such as a contract, will, promissory note, or share certificate. At page 801.
document (as a noun) 1. Something tangible on which words, symbols, or marks are recorded. At page 498.
Black's Law Dictionary 7th Edition, Bryan A. Garner, editor; West Group: St. Paul, MN, 1999: |
In Washington, a Will is:
An
instrument (ie, a document) --- that is
Executed
Validly as required by RCW 11.12.020. RCW 11.02.005(8)
In Washington, the definition of a Will also includes that of a Codicil: A Will that modifies or partially revokes an existing earlier Will. RCW 11.02.005(9)
Query: What would a document be that said "I revoke all prior Wills of mine."? If executed validly, it would appear to be a one sentence Will.
B. Its Valid Execution (ie, its signing & witnessing). ñ
| Probated Wills have included those written not only in ink but also in pencil, and not only on paper but also on a tractor's fender, a petticoat, and an empty egg shell, and not necessarily in English or even a language understood by the Testator so long as he/she understood the Will's provisions. Will made in a foreign language not understood by the Testator: Estate of Hille, 117 Wash. 205 (1921). See Atkinson, Handbook of the Law of Wills (2nd ed. 1953). |
1. Its Signing by the Testator
The document must be:
In writing, and
Signed by the Testator. RCW 11.12.020
In Writing: The "in writing" requirement means what it says: Written, whether typewritten, handwritten, or printed. Unlike some other jurisdictions, Washington does not require a Will to be typewritten or printed; the mere fact that it is handwritten, even by another, will not invalidate it so long as it is "in writing" and "signed by the Testator."
Signed by the Testator: A Will can be "signed by the Testator" in any of three ways:
By the Testator's Signature: The "signed by the Testator" requirement is most easily met by the Testator's actual signature.
| If the Testator signs by mark, then any signature by another is considered as identification of the Testator's mark and not as the Testator's signature by another, thus making a "signature by proxy" statement unnecessary. Points v. Nier, 91 Wash. 20 (1916). |
By the Testator's Mark: Such
as an "X." Estate of Young, 23 Wn. App. 761 (1979).
By Another
at the Testator's Request and in the Testator's Presence: In which case the
person (known as the "proxy") signing on behalf of the Testator must not only
sign the Testator's name but also:
State in
writing at the end of the Will that he/she signed the Testator's name at the
Testator's request, and
Sign the
statement in his/her own name.
RCW 11.12.030
A
suitable "signature by proxy" might be in the following form at the end of the Will, where the name of the hypothetical Testator is George Washington and that
of the proxy is John Adams:
/ signed George Washington /
I have signed the Testator's name at his request and in his presence.
/ signed John Adams /
|
Note that technically:
|
2. Its Attestation by Its Witnesses
The document must not only be signed by its Testator but also be witnessed by two of more persons who:
Are competent
adults, understand what they are doing, and are capable of testifying in
Court. Estate of Mitchell, 41 Wn.2d 326 (1952).
Have personal knowledge that the
Testator signed the Will. Estate of Chafey, 167 Wash. 185 (1932). And
Sign their names:
At the end of the Will,
At the Testator's
request, and
In the Testator's presence. RCW 11.12.020
The last three requirements (ie, a through c) can also be met by the witnesses' signing an Affidavit, instead of the Will, at the Testator's request and in the Testator's presence.
While a person who subscribes his/her name to a Will is uniformly referred to as a "witness," this description would appear to be misleading, and a more accurate name for such a person, in light of their actual responsibilities and duties, might be an "attestor." All that an "attestor" is attesting is that the Testator has:
Signed the Will in the attestor's presence, or
Acknowledged to the attestor that the signature is that of the Testator. Estate of Lindsay, 91 Wn. App. 944 (1998); Estate of Cronquist, 45 Wn.2d 244 (1954); Estate of Jones, 101 Wash. 128 (1918).
Attestation Issues:
Fiduciary Witness: The mere fact that one or more of the
Testator's fiduciaries (eg, named Personal Representative, Trustee,
Guardian, Agent, or Attorney) acts as a witness will not affect the validity of the Will.
Named Personal Representative as witness: Estate of Wiltzius, 42 Wn.2d
149 (1953). Personal Attorney as witness: Estate of Miller, 10
Wn.2d 258 (1941).
Interested Witness: If a Beneficiary
under the Will acts as a witness to it, then unless two disinterested
persons also witness the Will (making the Witness who is a Beneficiary
what is known as a "supernumerary" witness), the gift to that Beneficiary will be
presumed to have been made under duress, menace, fraud, or undue influence.
If that Beneficiary cannot successfully rebut that presumption, the
Beneficiary will be limited to no more than what he/she would have taken
had the Testator died without the Will (ie, intestate).
RCW 11.12.160
Self-Proving Will: Washington law, like the law of most, but not all,
other states (the exceptions are believed to be Maryland, Ohio, and Vermont)
provides for what is known as a "self-proving" Will --- in other words, a Will that the Probate Court will accept at the Testator's death without
having the witnesses come to Court and testify as to the truth of
their attestation. In order for a Will to be "self-proving," the
witnesses must sign either an Affidavit or a Declaration (also called a Certification) under
Penalty of Perjury stating that the statements that they would have
otherwise made in an
Attestation Clause are true.
RCW 11.20.020(2)
Estate of Starkel v. Wright, 134 Wn. App. 364 (2006) [Will attestation
clause satisfied by Declaration under Penalty of Perjury].
Notarization: Washington law does NOT require a Will to be notarized to be valid --- only (it is believed) Louisiana does. Using a Notary as a Witness or having the Will notarized is acceptable, but no legal benefit obtains from doing so (as long as the witnesses sign a Declaration under Penalty of Perjury, making the Will "self-proving"). RCW 9A.72.085 Estate of Starkel v. Wright, 134 Wn. App. 364 (2006) [Will attestation clause does not require notarization if signed with Declaration under Penalry of Perjury].
C. Common Law Requirements (Arcane). ñ
Besides the various statutory requirements for making a valid Will in Washington, those that are described above, there are a number of arcane, common law requirements that are often overlooked in determining the validity of a writing as a Will. Some of these are as follows:
Lack of Intent to Make a Will. The Testator must intend to make a Will. It is hard to see how this requirement might come into play in Washington, with Washington's virtual requirement for an attested Will (possibly an April Fool's "joke" Will?).
In other jurisdictions (such as California) where holographic
Wills
are valid, this requirement may have more teeth. For example, it would
invalidate the following two possibilities, both of which would otherwise
qualify in California as valid
Wills under
Calif. Probate Code § 6111: A law
professor teaching a Wills & Trusts class: Says
"I'm going to illustrate a holographic
Will,"
Writes
on the blackboard "I give my entire estate to whomever of you scores highest
on the final exam in this class,"
Signs
his/her name underneath, and
Immediately dies.
This
writing, although perhaps otherwise qualifying as a valid holographic
Will
in California, was intended as an example, not as the professor's actual
Will; therefore, no
Will. A
client: Writes
a handwritten letter to his/her personal attorney, Says in
the letter, "I want you to prepare a new
Signs
the letter, and
Immediately dies. This
writing, although perhaps otherwise qualifying as a valid holographic
A gift is conditioned on some event
not within the Testator's control and the condition is unfulfilled, eg, "This A gift fails to comply with the
future interest rules: It fails to transfer a complete
estate; A class gift fails to vest; or A gift fails to comply with a
technical property rule, such as the Doctrine of Worthier Title or the Rule in
Shelley's Case. An example of non-compliance with a
policy rule would be a gift that fails to satisfy the Rule Against
Perpetuities.
Will is valid if I die on my trip
to India"; the testator survived his/her trip to India; therefore, the
Will
became invalid. Will of Pascal, 309 N.Y. 108 (1955).